Justina Mikulskyte vs Josy Daems Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Oct at 02:32 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Mikulskyte vs J. Daems

LTU
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Mikulskyte 1 - 0 Daems
They have played 3 sets in total, with Justina Mikulskyte winning 2 and Josy Daems winning 1. The last match between Justina Mikulskyte and Josy Daems was at the W35 Loule, 30-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Justina Mikulskyte getting the victory 0-6 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mikulskyte | 1 |
| Daems | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Loule(10-30-25)
J. Mikulskyte vs J. Daems H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $59,200 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.13% (279-201) | Career Total W/L | 55.88% (57-45) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 7 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 66.67% (2-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Mikulskyte vs J. Daems Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Josy Daems has slightly outperformed Justina Mikulskyte, winning 39.65% of points on second serves versus Mikulskyte's 38.47%. Could this give Daems an edge?
- Return Game Stats: Mikulskyte has demonstrated a stronger return game, winning 52.05% of opponent’s second serve points, surpassing Daems at 48.95%. However, Daems excelled in first serve returns at 37.09%, compared to Mikulskyte's 33.93%.
- Breakpoints: Under pressure, Daems edges Mikulskyte slightly, saving 47.17% of breakpoints against Mikulskyte’s 46.50%.
- Overall Performance: Over the past year, Daems has a higher match win rate at 60.66% versus Mikulskyte's 54.17%. Does this indicate overall higher performance consistency?
- Surface Preference: Mikulskyte performs best on clay (61%) but struggles on grass (0%). In contrast, Daems is most successful on hard courts (61%) and less so on clay (49%).
- Event Level: Daems has been more successful in Futures tournaments with a 64.71% win rate, while Mikulskyte won 53.97% of her matches primarily at Challengers level.
- Opponent Quality: Mikulskyte has faced tougher competition, playing against opponents with an average rank of 334.54 compared to Daems’ 425.08.
- Deciding Set Performance: If the match extends to a deciding set, Daems has the upper hand, having won 75% of such sets, compared to Mikulskyte’s 55% over the last year.
Editorial Prediction (October 30, 2025, UTC):
Justina Mikulskyte enters the match showcasing a stronger return game, particularly on opponents' second serves. Her ability to face tougher ranked opponents over the past year might prepare her well for challenging matches.
Conversely, Josy Daems exhibits slightly better consistency under pressure and in deciding sets, which could tip the balance in tightly contested moments. Her prowess on hard courts could be instrumental, depending on the surface of play.
Overall, while Mikulskyte possesses skills that may challenge Daems, the stats suggest that Daems' consistency and ability to capitalize in crucial points give her a slight advantage. Based on recent trends and performance patterns, Josy Daems is more likely to emerge victorious in their upcoming tennis encounter.
Justina Mikulskyte vs Josy Daems Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Mikulskyte vs J. Daems H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 12 | Games Won | 13 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:52:53 | Average Match Time | 2:52:53 |
| 54% (45/83) | 1st Serve % | 73% (60/82) |
| 56% (25/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (39/60) |
| 45% (17/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (8/22) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Pts Won % | 45% (5/11) |
| 43% (35/82) | Return Points Win % | 49% (41/83) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Mikulskyte Recent Matches Played
J. Daems Recent Matches Played

J. Mikulskyte vs J. Daems Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.13% (279/201) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.88% (57/45) |
| 56.02% (619/486) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.59% (122/110) |
| 52.81% (5256/4697) | Games Win/Loss | 50.72% (1092/1061) |
| 61.17% (115/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.86% (22/13) |
| 60.91% (120/77) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.98% (24/25) |
| 48.35% (44/47) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.11% (11/7) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 684 | Aces Total | 86 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 1561 | Total Double Faults | 279 |
| 1:30:50 | Average Match Time | 1:40:39 |
| 461.17 | Average Opponent Rank | 475.9 |
| 62% (17456/28153) | 1st Serve % | 65% (4045/6209) |
| 60% (10442/17456) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (2365/4045) |
| 44% (4706/10697) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1001/2164) |
| 50% (1920/3860) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (376/800) |
| 48% (13669/28547) | Return Points Win % | 46% (2849/6183) |
| 33.33% (3/6) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.01% (191/150) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (19/19) |
| 66.13% (82/42) | Futures W/L | 59.38% (38/26) |
| 58% (272/471) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (56/101) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (28/64) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 70% (14/20) |
| 56% (83/149) | Deciding Set Win % | 69% (20/29) |
| 87% (259/225) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 96% (49/47) |
| 13% (259/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 4% (49/2) |
| 24% (220/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (53/10) |